Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 04:10
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
How is a narcissist likely to handle situations when confronted with hard truths about themselves?
What’s next?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
The Best Of Roots Picnic Made Up For The Absolute Worst - HuffPost
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Thank you.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
What was your wildest experience as a lesbian?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Anthropologists map Neanderthals' long and winding roads across Europe and Eurasia - Phys.org
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.